Pearson Edexcel International GCSE in History · 4HI1 · Free · no account needed
The changing role of international organisations: the league and the UN, 1919–c2011 · Option B5 · Paper 2 Section B — breadth study in change
Key topic 4 · The UN challenged, 1967–89
What a Grade 9 answer knows here. The specialised agencies — WHO's smallpox eradication above all — succeeded during the decades the Security Council was paralysed. Judging the UN by peacekeeping alone measures the part the Cold War had frozen.
Every lesson here ends the same way: learn it, teach it to an AI pupil who asks the awkward question, then defend it against the thinker with the strongest claim on it — free · no account needed.
2 lessons, each answering one essential question with the story, the dates that earn marks, the people to place, how historians disagree and the cap in the mark scheme that bites. Completely free.
The 2 lessons
Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon
What is a resolution worth if its two official texts say different things? After the Six-Day War the Security Council adopted Resolution 242 in November 1967.
Examined through consequence. Learn Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon →
Namibia and the problem of the Permanent Five
Why did a mission that had been impossible for forty years succeed in eighteen months? South West Africa had been a German colony administered by South Africa under a League mandate.
Examined through change and significance. Learn Namibia and the problem of the Permanent Five →
The dates that earn marks in this key topic
Two from each lesson, in the order the topic is taught — each with the reason it is worth a mark, and the lesson that places it.
- November 1967 — Resolution 242 is adopted with English and French texts that differ on which territories.
- The deliberate ambiguity made agreement possible and enforcement impossible, and both effects lasted decades. (Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon)
- October 1973 — Resolution 338 calls for a ceasefire and the implementation of 242 in all its parts.
- It restates the formula without resolving the ambiguity, which shows the problem being carried forward. (Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon)
- 1966 — The General Assembly terminates South Africa's mandate over the territory and renames it Namibia.
- It establishes the legal position twenty-three years before anything could be done about it. (Namibia and the problem of the Permanent Five)
- 1978 — Security Council Resolution 435 sets out a full plan for a ceasefire, elections and independence.
- The plan that worked in 1989 existed in 1978 and was unusable for eleven years. (Namibia and the problem of the Permanent Five)
The people to place
- Lord Caradon — British representative who drafted and introduced Resolution 242. (Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon)
- Gunnar Jarring — United Nations special representative who attempted to implement 242 by mediation. (Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon)
- Martti Ahtisaari — United Nations Special Representative for Namibia who headed the transition operation. (Namibia and the problem of the Permanent Five)
What students say — and what is actually the case
- “Resolution 242 required Israel to withdraw from all the occupied territories.” — The English text says territories and the French text says the territories, and both are official. The ambiguity was deliberate and has never been resolved. (Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon)
- “The United Nations became more capable at the end of the 1980s.” — Its rules, budget and structure were essentially unchanged. What changed was that the permanent members stopped blocking each other, which is why a plan from 1978 could be implemented in 1989. (Namibia and the problem of the Permanent Five)
What the specification asks for
The clauses of 4HI1 this key topic examines, one per lesson. Incandio is aligned to the specification and is not published by Pearson.
- “Case studies in limited success, including the UN role in the Middle East, especially the continuing Palestine problem – Resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) – and the problem of Lebanon (1975–85).” — Resolutions 242 and 338, and Lebanon
- “The attempt to resolve disputes in Namibia (1989). The problem of Security decisions – the 'Permanent 5'. The continuing work of the specialised agencies.” — Namibia and the problem of the Permanent Five
Then teach it, and defend it
Every lesson above ends the same way: you explain the argument to Ember, an AI pupil who asks the awkward question, and defend it in a structured debate marked against published descriptors.
All of The changing role of international organisations: the league and the UN, 1919–c2011 · Incandio History · The 4HI1 specification